IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
SYDNEY REGISTRY

COMMON LAW DIVISIONFile No: 20137/00


AFFIDAVIT

I, John Wilson of Elm Place, North Rocks in the State of New South Wales, say on oath:

1.I am the Deponent.

2.I truly believe that there is no law passed by any Australian Federal or State Parliaments which denies an Australian citizen of the right to trial by jury for the determination of his or her guilt or innocence when charged with the Common Law offence of contempt of court.

3.I truly believe that no jury has ever ruled that an Australian citizen is not entitled to trial by jury when he or she is charged with the Common Law offence of contempt of court.

4.I truly believe that Acting Justice Brian Murray's ruling, in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in the matter of File No: 20723 of 1997 dated 5 September 1997, that "the applicants in the performance of their judicial functions are immune from suit" (where "the applicants" are judges) is not based upon any law passed by any Australian Federal or State Parliament nor a judgment made by any Australian jury, but is a decision made by judges which is an agenda and policy to the prejudice of the people. Hereto attached is an Annexure marked "A" which is a copy of that Judgement.

5.I truly believe that the right to trial by jury is inalienable and essential to the preservation of liberty. This is a stand which I consistently maintain in the book I have written called "BANKS AND JUDGES" (ISBN 1 74018 020 8) and in the Internet Website I have composed with the dialing address of http://rightsandwrong.com.au . Annexed hereto attached and marked "B" is a photocopy of the cover of this book which was annexed to the first attempt to file this affidavit but was not accepted by a filing clerk on the 5th floor of the Law Courts Building, Queen's Square, Sydney on 27th July, 2000 who said that the book must be presented as an "exhibit". Also annexed hereto and marked "C" is a copy of the Home Page of that Website.

6.I truly believe that should the jury in this case rule that an Australian citizen does not have the right to trial by jury, then a precedent will be created delivering sovereignty, ie: supreme authority over the people of Australia, into the hands of judges and there would be not right of redress or remedy to any rulings made by persons who are not elected by the people.


Sworn at...........

on.............., 2000

before me ........................
(Justice of the Peace/Solicitor)

IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
SYDNEY REGISTRY

COMMON LAW DIVISION File No: 20137/00

AFFIDAVIT

I, John Wilson of Elm Place, North Rocks in the State of New South Wales, say on oath:

1.I am the Deponent.

2.I initiated this action for TORT by means of a Statement of Claim filed on 11th April, 2000 and, at the same time, filed a Requisition for Trial by Jury. And, on 27th July, 2000, I filed a Notice to Set Down for Trial by Jury to be dealt with on 7th August, 2000.

3.In the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Queen's Square, Sydney on Monday, 7th August, 2000, The Honourable Justice Sperling relegated these proceedings to a "Holding List".

4.I truly believe that the setting of a date for trial by jury is a matter of urgency and necessity in the interests of administering justice and redressing serious wrongs done to me and my family emotionally, financially and to our reputation and relationships.

5.I truly believe that the arbitrary actions of the judiciary are of national importance and must be brought before a tribunal that is the traditional representation of the country as established by law, ie: a jury. No judicial officer of any rank can judge this case because he or she is employed by the Defendant, ie: the State of New South Wales, and is automatically disqualified.

6.I truly believe that the issues containing in my Affidavits filed in this matter must be addressed as soon as possible to resolve similar predicaments that have occurred or are likely to occur in the future. In other words, these issues concern the administration of public justice and community welfare. 

7.On Monday, 7th August, 2000, the Crown Solicitor was seeking to have the proceedings dismissed. However, because no judicial officer can make any determinations of any kind which might bear upon the outcome of these proceedings, I truly believe that any motions - either filed by the Plaintiff or by the Defendant - can only be made to a jury.

8.Magna Carta 1215 -1297 says "To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay Right or Justice." and the Imperial Acts Application Act 1969 No. 30 says that any person guilty of such an offence is liable to 5 years imprisonment.

9.I truly believe that The Honourable Justice Sperling, on Monday 7th August, 2000, could have referred the matter to the List Judge for the setting down for trial but, instead, chose to delay proceedings by relegating them to the "Holding List".

........John Wilson.........

Sworn at ...North Rocks.............

on ......9th August...........2000

before me..........Carol Hamilton JP 9425132
(Justice of the Peace/Solicitor)